The Bekasi Regency Government’s Efforts to Preserve Local Culture at Gedung Juang 45

Authors

  • Rifqi Ramadhani Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Yudhistira Ardi Poetra Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v1i4.1448

Keywords:

Cultural Preservation, Local Identity, Qualitative Research, Government Policy, Gedung Juang 45

Abstract

This study explores the efforts of the Bekasi Regency Government in preserving local culture through the Gedung Juang 45 Museum as a historical and cultural landmark. Employing a qualitative descriptive method, the research seeks to understand how the local government, cultural institutions, and community members collaboratively sustain cultural identity amidst urban modernization. Data were collected through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation, involving key informants such as cultural division staff, heritage experts, and museum visitors. The results reveal that cultural preservation initiatives extend beyond physical restoration to include educational programs, public participation, and symbolic communication practices that strengthen local heritage awareness. Gedung Juang 45 functions as a communicative space linking the past and present through exhibitions, historical narratives, and participatory activities. The study highlights the importance of cultural interaction, government policy, and public involvement in maintaining social and cultural continuity. Ultimately, cultural preservation in Bekasi is shown not only as a governmental obligation but as a shared responsibility in cultivating collective memory and regional identity.

References

Adeng. (2014). Budaya Bekasi: Antara Sunda dan Betawi. Universitas Indonesia Press.

Afdhilah, M. (2019). Komunikasi lintas budaya: Teori dan praktik. Deepublish.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik (Revised ed.). Rineka Cipta.

Arofi, M. (2018). Government public relations: Teori dan praktik humas pemerintahan. Prenadamedia Group.

Cutlip, S. M., & Center, A. H. (2000). Effective public relations (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Fallahnda, F. (2021). Peran budaya lokal dalam masyarakat pedesaan di Jawa Tengah. Universitas Negeri Semarang Press.

Ghony, M. D., & Almanshur, F. (2012). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Idris, A. (2022). Sejarah budaya Ommelanden: Asal mula asimilasi di Bekasi. Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Koentjaraningrat. (1983). Kebudayaan, mentalitas, dan pembangunan. Gramedia.

Kusumastuti, D., & Prilianti, L. (2017). Komunikasi budaya dalam masyarakat multikultural. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 14(2), 101–113.

Lani, S., & Handayani, T. (2021). Public relations pemerintah dalam komunikasi kebijakan publik. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(3), 45–58.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.

Nahak, H. M. (2019). Globalisasi dan pergeseran budaya lokal di Indonesia. Jurnal Humaniora, 8(1), 23–34.

Oktaviani, R. (2022). Revitalisasi Gedung Juang 45 sebagai museum digital Bekasi. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.

Quill, T., & Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

Rohmat Kurnia. (2009). Sejarah perjuangan rakyat Bekasi. Bekasi Heritage Foundation.

Setyaningrum, D. (2018). Budaya lokal dan spiritualitas masyarakat desa. Jurnal Sosiohumaniora, 20(1), 33–45.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryani. (2019). Komunikasi antarbudaya dan perubahan sosial. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Suwanto, S. (2018). Public relations dan humas pemerintahan di era digital. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 10(2), 55–70.

Triwardani, R., & Rochyanti, E. (2014). Pelestarian budaya lokal dalam pembangunan nasional. Jurnal Kebudayaan, 9(2), 45–59.

Published

2023-02-28

How to Cite

Ramadhani, R., & Ardi Poetra, Y. (2023). The Bekasi Regency Government’s Efforts to Preserve Local Culture at Gedung Juang 45. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary, 1(4), 544–552. https://doi.org/10.38035/ijam.v1i4.1448