Systematic Literature Review Cost Efficiency with Fuel and using Onshore Power Supply
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v3i4.2033Keywords:
OPS, Greenport, Cost and Environmental BenefitAbstract
The shipping world has now entered the zeroemission era by the IMO where members apply zero emission at the Port which aims to create a Green Port. In Indonesia, regulations on the implementation of OPS installations at the Port are contained in the Decree of the Minister of Transportation of the Republic of Indonesia number 8 of 2023 concerning the Determination of Climate Change Mitigation Actions in the Transportation Sector for Achieving the Target Contribution of the Utilization of New Renewable Energy (EBT) where the form of mitigation action is a. Implementation of OPS at the Port b. Making Regulations and Monitoring OPS Implementation so that the success indicator is reduced ship fuel consumption while docked at the Port. The coding used in this research is Green Port, Cost and Enviromental Benefit, Cost Efficiency, Renewable Energy, Saving Cost of the Ship Maintenance, Saving the cost of Fuel.
References
Bakar, N. N. A., Bazmohammadi, N., Vasquez, J. C., & Guerrero, J. M. (2023). Electrification of onshore power systems in maritime transportation towards decarbonization of ports: A review of the cold ironing technology. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178(January), 1–16.
Bandur & Budiastuti. (2018). Validitas dan Reliabilitas Penelitian. Jakarta : Mitra Wacana Media.
Basset, A Gammal. (2018). A New Hybrid Multi Criteria decision making approach for location selection offshore wind energy sitations. Elseiver. A case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 280(2), 19
Beermann, N. (2014). Case Study Onshore Power Supply Facility at the Cruise Terminal Altona in Hamburg. The Interrreg IVB North Sea Region Program Ten-tans, 1(1), 1–27.
Canbulat, O. (2014). Sustainable operation management: Green performance criteria for container terminals
Colarossi, D., & Principi, P. (2020). Technical analysis and economic evaluation of a complex shore-to-ship power supply system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 181(1), 1–11.
Darbra, R. M., Puig, M., Azarkamand, S., Wooldridge, C., & Selén, V. (2022). Science of the Total Environment Insights on the environmental management system of the European port sector. Science of the Total Environment journal, 806(1), 1–9.
Deveci, Dragan & Ilgin, (2022). Fuzzy Einstein WASPAS approach for the economic and societal dynamics of the climate change mitigation strategies in urban mobility planning. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics Volume 61, June 2022, Pages 1-17
Esmaeli, A. (2023). Rate-based modeling and energy optimization of acid gas removal from natural gas stream using various amine solutions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 177(1), 643–663.
Gao, A. M. Z., Huang, C. H., Lin, J. C., & Su, W. N. (2021). Review of recent offshore wind power strategy in Taiwan: Onshore wind power comparison. Energy Strategy Reviews, 38, 100747. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2021.100747
German-galkin, S., & Tarnapowicz, D. (2020). Energy Optimization of the ‘ Shore to Ship ’ System — A Universal Power System for Ships at Berth in a Port. Sensors, 1(1), 1–20.
Guerrero, J. M., Sadiq, M., Ali, S. W., Terriche, Y., Mutarraf, M. U., & Hassan, M. A. (2021). Future Greener Seaports : A Review of New Infrastructure , Challenges , and Energy Efficiency Measures. IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY SECTION, 9(1), 75568–75587.
Ichinose, Y., Hayashi, M., Nomura, S., Moser, B., & Hiekata, K. (2022). Sustainable Data Centers in Southeast Asia: Offshore, Nearshore, and Onshore Systems for Integrated Data and Power. Sustainable Cities and Society, 81, 103867. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCS.2022.103867
Jikiun, S. P., Tatham, M., & Oltedal, V. M. (2023). Saved by hydrogen? The public acceptance of onshore wind in Norway. Journal of Cleaner Production, 408, 136956. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2023.136956
Kano, N., Tian, Z., Chinomi, N., & Hillmansen, S. (2022). Comparison of renewable integration schemes for AC railway power supply system. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 12(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1049/ELS2.12048
Kiunke, T., Gemignani, N., Malheiro, P., & Brudermann, T. (2022). Key factors influencing onshore wind energy development: A case study from the German North Sea region. Energy Policy, 165(2022), 112962. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2022.112962
Kizielewicz, J. (2023). Environmentally Friendly Cruise Seaports in Northern Europe – Onshore Power Supply. TransNAV the International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 17(2), 357–363. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.17.02.12
Krämer, I., & Czermański, E. (2020). Onshore power one option to reduce air emissions in ports. NachhaltigkeitsManagementForum, 28(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00497-y
Krauland, A. Von, Permien, F., Enevoldsen, P., & Jacobson, M. Z. (2021). Smart Energy Onshore wind energy atlas for the United States accounting for land use restrictions and wind speed thresholds. Smart Energy, 3(2021), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segy.2021.100046
Langer, J., Zaaijer, M., Quist, J., & Blok, K. (2023). Introducing site selection flexibility to technical and economic onshore wind potential assessments : New method with application to Indonesia. Renewable Energy, 202(November 2022), 320–335.
Li, K., & Du, K. (2020). Research on Onshore Power Supply System in Port for Ships. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 558(5), 52022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/558/5/052022
Linnerud, K., Dugstad, A., & Rygg, B. J. (2022). Do people prefer offshore to onshore wind energy ? The role of ownership and intended use. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168(1), 1–12.
McKenna, R., Mulalic, I., Soutar, I., Weinand, J. M., Price, J., Petrović, S., & Mainzer, K. (2022). Exploring trade-offs between landscape impact, land use and resource quality for onshore variable renewable energy: an application to Great Britain. Energy, 250, 123754. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENERGY.2022.123754
Musyoka, M. D. (2019). Monetary and ecological cost-benefit analysis of onshore power supply : a case study of the port of Mombasa. World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University.
Muthoora, T., & Fischer, T. B. (2019). Power and perception – From paradigms of specialist disciplines and opinions of expert groups to an acceptance for the planning of onshore windfarms in England – Making a case for Social Impact Assessment (SIA). Land Use Policy, 89(1), 104198. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2019.104198
Nortier, N. S., Lowenthal, K., Luxembourg, S. L., Neut, A. van der, Mewe, A. A., & Sark, W. G. J. H. M. van. (2022). Spatially resolved generation profiles for onshore and offshore wind turbines : A case study of four Dutch energy transition scenarios. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Transition, 2(December 2021), 1–17.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penyelenggaran Bidang Pelayaran
Rutherford, D., Wang, H., & Mao, X. (2015). COSTS AND BENEFITS OF SHORE POWER AT THE PORT OF SHENZHEN. December.
SÁENZ, J. G. (2019). Energy analysis and costs estimation of an On-shore Power Supply system in the Port of Gävle (Nomor June). FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Department of Building Engineering, Energy Systems and Sustainability Science.
Santander, A., Aspuru, I., & Fernandez, P. (2018). OPS Master Plan for Spanish Ports Project . Study of potential acoustic benefits of on-shore power supply at berth. Euronoise 2018 - Conference Proceedings, 1(1), 2887–2894.
Samosir, D. H., Markert, M., & Busse, W. (2017). The Technical and Business Analysis of Using Shore Power Connection in The Port of Hamburg.
Shepherd, A., Roberts, S., Sünnenberg, G., Lovett, A., & Hastings, A. F. S. (2021). Scotland ’ s onshore wind energy generation , impact on natural capital & satisfying no-nuclear energy policy. Contents lists available at ScienceDirect E, 7(2021), 7106–7117.
Sienkiewicz, Ł., & Ryndzionek, R. (2020). Evolution of the HVDC Link Connecting Offshore Wind Farms to Onshore Power Systems. MDPI Energies, 13(1914), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081914
Tai, H. H., & Chang, Y. H. (2022). Reducing pollutant emissions from vessel maneuvering in port areas. Maritime Economics & Logistics (2022), 24(1), 651–671.
Tarnapowicz, D., & GERMAN-GALKIN, S. (2018). INTERNATIONAL STANDARDIZATION IN THE DESIGN OF “SHORE TO SHIP” - POWER SUPPLY SYSTEMS OF SHIPS IN PORT. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 26(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelayaran
Wang, L., Liang, C., Shi, J., Molavi, A., Lim, G., & Zhang, Y. (2021). A bilevel hybrid economic approach for optimal deployment of onshore power supply in maritime ports. Applied Energy, 292(1), 116892. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2021.116892
Valentino F , R. O. S. Gurning, and A. A. . Dinariyana, Optimasi skenario bunkering dan kecepatan kapal pada pelayaran tramper” JTek. POMITS, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2012
Weinand, J. M., McKenna, R., Heinrichs, H., Roth, M., Stolten, D., & Fichtner, W. (2022). Exploring the trilemma of cost-efficiency, landscape impact and regional equality in onshore wind expansion planning. Advances in Applied Energy, 7, 100102. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADAPEN.2022.100102
Yustiano, Oscar Yogi. (2014). Cost and Benefit Analysis of Shore Side Electricity in The Port of Tanjung Perak Indonesia. Malmö (SWE): World Maritime University
Zarkovi, S. D., Shayesteh, E., & Hilber, P. (2021). Onshore wind farm - Reliability centered cable routing. Electric Power Systems Research, 196(March), 1–11.
Zhang, Y., Liang, C., Shi, J., Lim, G., & Wu, Y. (2022). Optimal Port Microgrid Scheduling Incorporating Onshore Power Supply and Berth Allocation Under Uncertainty. Applied Energy, 313, 118856. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2022.118856
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Febriyanti Febriyanti, Muhammad Thamrin, Lira Agusinta, Yosi Pahala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share— copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt— remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution— You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions— You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.
