Mediating Role Emotions in Framing News Public Train Fare Policy in Jakarta

Authors

  • Shania Alya' Hisna Pascasarjana Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Mario Aditya Prasetyo Pascasarjana Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Salsabila Gunawijaya Pascasarjana Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
  • Salya Elva Corinna Pascasarjana Departemen Ilmu Komunikasi, FISIP Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v4i4.1416

Keywords:

Framing Berita, Kereta Rel Listrik (KRL), Mediasi Emosi, Opini Publik

Abstract

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi peran mediasi emosi dalam framing berita terhadap opini publik mengenai kebijakan kenaikan tarif Kereta Rel Listrik (KRL) di wilayah Jakarta. Melalui pendekatan kuantitatif dan desain eksperimen, penelitian ini menggunakan framing berita positif dan negatif untuk mengukur pengaruh variabel mediasi emosi positif (antusiasme, bangga) dan emosi negatif (takut, marah) serta dampaknya terhadap opini publik. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan metode PROCESS untuk mengevaluasi hubungan langsung dan tidak langsung antara variabel framing, emosi, dan opini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa framing berita positif maupun negatif tidak memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap emosi atau opini publik. Efek tidak langsung melalui emosi sebagai mediator juga tidak signifikan meskipun terdapat kecenderungan hubungan pada beberapa variabel. Temuan ini dapat diketahui bahwa pengaruh framing berita terhadap opini publik tidak selalu langsung atau konsisten, melainkan dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor lain seperti konteks sosial, relevansi personal, dan keterlibatan individu dalam isu yang diberitakan.

References

Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic framing.

Political Communication, 28(2), 207–226.

Cresswell, J. W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed.

Pustaka Pelajar.

De Hoog, N., & Verboon, P. (2019). Is The News Making Us Unhappy? The Influence of

Daily News Expose On Emotional States. The British Psychological Society, 111.

Delice, A. (2010). The Sampling Issues in Quantitative Research. Educational Sciences:

Theory & Practice, 10(4), 2001–2018.

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of

Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-

1993.tb01304.x

Eriyanto. (2011). Analisis Framing: Kontruksi, Ideologi, dan Politik Media. LkiS.

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard

University Press.

Gowda, G. S., Gopika, G., Sanjay, T. N., Kumar, C. N., Manjunatha, N., Yadav, R., Srinivas,

D., Bharath, R. D., & Math, S. B. (2019). Challenges Faced by State and Society in Providing Care to Homeless Mentally Ill Patients. Indian Journal of Social Psychiatry, 35(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/0.4103/ijsp.ijsp_122_17

Hussein, A. (2011). Mix Methodology Dalam Penelitian Komunikasi. Aspikom.

Ková?, J. (2023). Media framing of immigrants in Central Europe in the period surrounding

the refugee crisis: security, negativity, and political sources. Communications, 48(1), 5–27.

Kruikemeier, S., Gattermann, K., & Vliegenthart, R. (2018). Understanding the dynamics of

politicians’ visibility in traditional and social media. The Information Society, 34(4), 215–228.

Lecheler, S., Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2013). Dealing with feelings: Positive and

negative discrete emotions as mediators of news framing effects. Communications, 38(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2013-0011

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the

indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.

McQuail, D. (2010). McQuail’s mass communication theory (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the Framing Effects of Emotion. Communication Research,

(2), 224–247.

Olli, H., & Erlita, N. (2011). Opini Publik (Edisi Kedu). PT INDEKS Permata Puri Media.

Pratama, A. P., Wahyuputri, F. W., & Kurniawan, Y. R. (2024). Subsidi KRL Berbasis NIK:

Kebijakan yang Mengabaikan Esensi Transportasi Publik (Issue September 2024).

Putri, A. I. E., Sukmana, O., & Susilo, R. K. D. (2024). Pandangan Revolusioner Generasi Z

Terhadap Praktik Money Politik: Tinjauan Literatur. Aksiologi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial.

Sarihati, T., Si, M., Luthfie, H. M., & Kurniadi, B. (2022). Komunikasi Politik, Media

Downloads

Published

2025-11-07

How to Cite

Alya’ Hisna, S., Prasetyo, M. A., Gunawijaya, S., & Corinna, S. E. (2025). Mediating Role Emotions in Framing News Public Train Fare Policy in Jakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Multidisiplin, 4(4), 2657–2666. https://doi.org/10.38035/jim.v4i4.1416

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin (Oktober - November 2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Shania Alya' Hisna, Mario Aditya Prasetyo, Salsabila Gunawijaya, Salya Elva Corinna

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Share— copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  • Adapt— remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  • Attribution— You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions— You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

  • You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  • No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rightsmay limit how you use the material.