“Hermeneutics For Judges in Deciding Case Number: 66/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn. Brb”
Keywords:
Hermenutics, Judges, Case DecisionsAbstract
This thesis research aims to find the basis of Hermeneutics in the Judge's Decision, in case Number 66/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Brb, related to the problem of illegal narcotics trade and complex narcotics crimes because there are three factors causing the increase in illegal narcotics circulation, namely weak interdiction capacity which will result in an increase in the risk of illicit narcotics trafficking, increased narcotics abuse which results in increased demand for narcotics, and lack of cooperation between law enforcement agencies both nationally and internationally. This research uses a normative legal research method, namely, which is carried out by examining norms or laws as its source. This research aims to find legal rules, legal principles, or legal doctrines to answer the legal issues faced. The results of this research based on the Judge's decision state that the defendant's actions are considered to violate Article 114 paragraph (1) of Law No. 35/2009 concerning Narcotics, subsidiary Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 35 of 2009 concerning narcotics. In criminal cases such as Number 66/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Brb, some of the bases underlying the use of hermeneutics in case Number 66/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Brb include the complexity of legal facts, limitations of legal texts and plurality of Interpretation: Law is not an exact science. There is the possibility of various interpretations of a legal rule. Hermeneutics encourages judges to make critical and rational interpretations, by considering various points of view.
References
Book
Akbar, Patrialis, 2013. The Relationship between the Presidential Institution and the House of Representatives and the President's Veto, Total Media, Yogyakarta.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly, 2010. The Indonesian Constitution & Constitutionalism, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Bagijo, Himawan Estu, 2014, The State of Law & the Constitutional Court, Graphic Design Research Institute, Yogyakarta.
Harahap, Yahya, 2008, The Power of the Supreme Court to Examine Cassation and Review Civil Cases, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Kansil, CST and Cristine ST Kansil, 2008, Constitutional Law of the Republic of Indonesia, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.
Martitah, 2013, The Constitutional Court from Negative Legislature to Positive Legislature, Konstitusi Press: Jakarta.
Mustofa, Wildan Suyuthi, 2013, Judges' Code of Ethics, Kencana, Jakarta. Soehino, 2005, State Science, Liberty, Yogyakarta.
Soimin and Mashuriyanto, 2013, The Constitutional Court in the Indonesian State System, UII Press, Yogyakarta.
Wiyono, R, 2010, State Administrative Court Procedure Law, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Asnawi, MN (2014). Hermeneutics of Judges' Decisions. Yogyakarta: UII Press. Tridiatno, YA (2015). Restorative Justice. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Syamsudin, M. (2012), New Construction of the Legal Culture of Judges. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Khuluq, M. Khusnul, S.Sy., MH et al. (2021). Law for Justice with Various Implementation Efforts. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.
Supreme Court, (2024). Existence and Role of the Judicial Commission: Study of the Philosophical Context, History and Purpose of its Establishment in the Dynamics of Indonesian Constitution.
Solomon, Robert C. & Higgins, Kathleen M. (2010). The Big Questions: A Short Introduction to Philosophy. USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Suprapn Usman, Dr. (2024) Philosophy
Sunarto, SH, MH, Dr., (2021). Limitations of the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission in Supervising Judges. Jakarta: Kencana (Prenada Media).
Journal
Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Application of Restorative Justice Principles in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2). doi:10.31602/al- adl.v10i2.1362.
Candra, S. (2013). Restorative Justice: A Review of Criminal Law Reform in Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media for National Legal Development, 2(2).
Haryadi, L., & Suteki, S. (2017). Implementation of Social Justice Values by Judges in the Lanjar Sriyanto Case from the Perspective of Pancasila and the Code of Ethics of the Judicial Profession. Law Reform, 13(2), 165. doi:10.14710/lr.v13i2.16153.
Prayitno, KP (2012). Restorative Justice for the Courts in Indonesia (Philosophical Juridical Perspective in Law Enforcement In Concreto. Journal of Legal Dynamics, 12 (3), 412. doi:10.20884/1.jdh.2012.12.
Septianita, H. (2018). Restorative Justice in Juvenile Criminal Decisions. Judicial Journal, 11(2), 205. doi:10.29123/jy.v11i2.290.
Sodiqin, A. (2015). Restorative Justice in the Crime of Murder: Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law. Asy-Syir'ah: Journal of Sharia and Legal Sciences, 49(1), 64. doi: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v2i1.575.
Sosiawan, UM (2017). Perspective of Restorative Justice as a Form of Protection for Children in Conflict with the Law. De Jure Legal Research Journal, 16(4), 426. doi:10.30641/dejure.2016.
Sukardi, S. (2016). The Existence of the Concept of Restorative Justice in the Criminal Law System in Indonesia. Legal Pluralism: Journal of Law Science, 6(1).
Sudiarawan, KA, Tanaya, PE, & Hermanto, B. (2020). Discover the Legal Concept in the Sociological Study. Substantive Justice International Journal of Law, 3(1), 94-108.
Sunaryo, S., & Purnamawati, SA (2019). The Right Legal Paradigm and Good Law (Perspective of Judges' Decision Design in Corruption Cases in Indonesia). Criminal Law and Legal Development, 1(2).
Syamsudin, M. (2012), New Construction of the Legal Culture of Judges, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Yulia, R. (2012). Implementation of Restorative Justice in Judges' Decisions: Efforts to Resolve Conflicts Through the Criminal Justice System. Judicial Journal, 5(2), 226. doi:10.29123/jy.v5i2.155.
Internet / World Wide Web:
Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia. KY Stresses Judges Must Have Integrity and Fairness.
Legislation
Constitution
Code of LawCriminal Code (KUHP).
Law No. 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court
Law No. 22 of 2004 concerning the Judicial Commission
Law No. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power
Law No. 49 of 2009 concerning General Courts
SKB MA and KY 2009 Concerning the Code of Ethics and Guidelines for the Conduct of Judges
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1982 Number 76; Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2012 Number 153; Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5332).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Law (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 1982 Number 76; Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 3209).
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 2012 Number 153; Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5332).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mahyuni Mahyuni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish their manuscripts in this journal agree to the following conditions:
- The copyright on each article belongs to the author(s).
- The author acknowledges that the Greenation Law an Humanities Review (GLHR) has the right to be the first to publish with a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
- Authors can submit articles separately, arrange for the non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (e.g., sent to the author's institutional repository, publication into books, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Greenation Law an Humanities Review (GLHR).
