Digital Humanities and Multisentric Law: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Resolving Land Disputes Between PT Rapp and The Dayun Community

Authors

  • Rahmiati Rahmiati Law Study Program – Tangerang Raya University, Tigaraksa, Banten, Indonesia Countries
  • Ghazza Jaudat Fastmadhi Al Mu'min Muhammadiyah Islamic Boarding School, Temanggung, Indonesia,
  • Nazwa Svenska Aulia Fastmadhi Al Mu'min Muhammadiyah Islamic Boarding School, Temanggung, Indonesi
  • Deddi Fasmadhy Satiadharmanto Law Study Program – Tangerang Raya University, Tigaraksa, Banten, Indonesia Countries

Keywords:

Land dispute, cultural values, digital humanities, multisentric law, mediation, community satisfaction, customary law, interdisciplinary approach

Abstract

The research demonstrates that mediation respecting customary traditions is more effective than formal legal approaches that disregard the socio-cultural context.( Miller et al.” Supervising Minorities—Respecting Individual and Cultural Differences”, Effective Police Supervision – 2020). This highlights the significance of the multisentric law approach, where legal processes must be open to social and cultural norms to achieve more satisfactory outcomes for the community. In the context of digital humanities, technology can be leveraged to support dispute resolution through digital mapping and more detailed analysis of cultural data. The use of digital mapping to visually document customary land claims can help clarify conflicts and improve accuracy in the mediation process.( Pratiwi & Juerges, “Digital advocacy at the science-policy interface: Resolving land-use conflicts in conservation forests”, Land Use Policy – 2022).  Integrating digital technology with legal and cultural approaches would result in a more comprehensive and inclusive resolution, as shown by the study's findings (with over 70% of respondents satisfied with mediation based on customary practices). The interdisciplinary approach combining digital humanities and multisentric law creates a land dispute resolution process that is more relevant to the socio-cultural context of the local community. (Wang & Chen ,” From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution: towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China”, International Journal of Law in Context – 2020).This ensures that the solutions are not only legally valid but also accepted by the community, thereby enhancing the legitimacy and effectiveness of the mediation process.

References

Anonymous (2023). Appreciating "Crows Returning to the Forest" Artwork through Cultural Contexts. Asian Journal of Research in Education and Social Sciences.

Davydenko, A. (2021). Mediation and Amicable Dispute Resolution in the Russian Legal and Cultural Traditions. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Etale, & Simatele (2023). Mapping Contradictions Within the Legal Frameworks and Cultural Norms on women’s Right to Land and Agriculture in Western Kenya. In Political Economy of Gender and Development in Africa.

Lee, & Kim (2023). Do cultural values influence how we perceive the police? Examining the cultural impact of Confucian values on the perception of police legitimacy. Policing: An International Journal.

Miribung (2024). Social Farming in EU from Legal to Sociological Perspective: Developing European Solution. Laws.

Miller, E., et al. (2020). Supervising Minorities—Respecting Individual and Cultural Differences. In Effective Police Supervision. [Editor buku, Penerbit, Kota terbit, halaman]

Null, et al. (2020). Mediation of land disputes between PT Perkebunan Nusantara (PTPN) VII Cinta Manis and Rengas Village Farmers, Ogan Ilir Regency Sumatera Selatan Province. In Management and entrepreneurship: trends of development.

Pratiwi, A., & Juerges, H. (2022). Digital advocacy at the science-policy interface: Resolving land-use conflicts in conservation forests. In Land Use Policy. [Editor buku, Penerbit, Kota terbit, halaman]

Proferes, L. (2020). What Ethics can Offer the Digital Humanities and What the Digital Humanities can Offer Ethics. In Routledge International Handbook of Research Methods in Digital Humanities. [Editor buku, Penerbit, Kota terbit, halaman]

Ressy, H., Lestari, R., & Hasanah, U. (2022). Penyelesaian sengketa tanah antara PT Riau Andalan Pulp and Paper dengan petani kelapa sawit desa Dayun di Kecamatan Dayun Kabupaten Siak. SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, 1(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.55681/seikat.v1i1.107

Schabas (2021). Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and Customary International Law. In Furthering the Frontiers of International Law: Sovereignty, Human Rights, Sustainable Development.

Sekotibo (2021). The Strength of Evidence (Certificate) in Land Rights Disputes According to Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 Concerning Land Registration. Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System.

Shidarta, S. (2022). Multisentrisme Humaniora Digital: Filsafat Hukum Masa Depan dan Masa Depan Filsafat Hukum. Orasi Ilmiah pada Pengukuhan Guru Besar dalam bidang Filsafat Hukum, Universitas Bina Nusantara.

Tanca (2024). Mappers, Mapmakers, and Cartographers and Where to Find Them in Contemporary Art (a Modest Proposal). JoLMA.

Tobol (2018). Integrating Social Justice Values into the Teaching of Legal Research and Writing: Reflections from the Field. In Educating for Justice: Social Values and Legal Education.

Wang, & Chen (2020). From alternative dispute resolution to pluralist dispute resolution: towards an integrated dispute-resolution mechanism in China. International Journal of Law in Context.

Wulansari, et al. (2019). Right of Access to Area of Depreciated Land Regulation with the Law Perspective of Land Registry in Indonesia. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal.

Jennyola Savira & Gunawan Djajaputra (2024). The Role of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency (ATR/BPN) as a Government Institution Facilitating the Electronic Land Certificate Policy. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities.

Davis, W. (2023). Indigenous Knowledge in Urban Indigenous Communities: Heritage, Indigenous Doing, and Wellbeing. [Penerbit, Kota terbit]

Langmia, A., et al. (2024). Mixed-method research and the African context. In Research Methods for African Scholarship. [Penerbit, Kota terbit]

Published

2024-10-06

How to Cite

Rahmiati, R., Jaudat Fastmadhi, G., Svenska Aulia Fastmadhi, N., & Fasmadhy Satiadharmanto, D. (2024). Digital Humanities and Multisentric Law: an Interdisciplinary Approach to Resolving Land Disputes Between PT Rapp and The Dayun Community. Greenation Law and Humanities Review, 1(1), 26–41. Retrieved from https://greenpub.org/GLHR/article/view/685